نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانش پژوه سطح 4 فلسفه اسلامی، حوزه علمیه خراسان، مدرسه علمیه عالی نواب مشهد ایران
2 استادیار گروه فلسفه و حکمت اسلامی، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Explaining the nature and existential dimensions of human beings, particularly the transpersonal and transcendent dimensions of the psyche, has consistently been a fundamental issue in philosophy, theology, and psychology. This article aims to conduct a comparative and critical study of the theory of the “collective unconscious” in Carl Gustav Jung’s analytical psychology and the theory of “Fitrah” (primordial human nature), emphasizing the views of Professor Morteza Motahhari in elucidating these dimensions. The research methodology is analytical-critical, and data collection was carried out through library research using a documentary approach. The findings reveal that although these two theories share formal similarities in addressing the transpersonal and a priori dimensions of the psyche, they exhibit fundamental differences and divergences concerning their ontological, epistemological, and teleological foundations. The comparative analysis demonstrates that Jung’s theory (archetypes) faces challenges and reductionism in providing an ultimate explanation for these dimensions due to the lack of a coherent metaphysical framework, ambiguity regarding their origin, and the inability to present a transcendent telos for human beings. Conversely, evaluations indicate that the theory of Fitrah in Motahhari’s thought, grounded in robust metaphysical foundations, epistemological coherence, and divine teleology, offers a more comprehensive and profound framework for explaining the transpersonal dimensions of human beings.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)